Mens sana in corpore sano: this ancient saying has never felt more true as it does in our age of decay and degeneration. We have severed the bonds of blood and abandonded the rural soil. Thus, we have become ill and tainted, sick in body and mind.
I believe that a return to the land, to our…
The Vanir came from the North Pole, the Aesir from the Southeast. They brought with them Atlas, whose real name is Irmin, or IR (Power), he was a Van. In any case He was a Hyperborean, or rather a Venusian, One from Venus. Aesir and Vanir are identical beings, like the Tuatha de Dannan of the Irish saga, who have arrived from a common cosmic point, as exiles who have fallen into the later mixture with the sons of Evenor and Leucippe, with the terrestrial involuted beings, the products of Earth, possibly with the “robots” who were sent or left here, or with the degenerate remnants of a far older, primordial catastrophe that was even more horrifying. Poseidon, who is also IR, was the first to fall through His relationship with Cleito, Fathering the Heroes, the Kings of Atlantis-Hyperborea, the semi-divine Beings. Thus the Norsemen (also the Merovingians, the Visigoths and the Friesians) are a product of the interbreeding of Divine Beings with the semi-divine Aesir and Vanir. Friesian means free, Freeman. Frigga is the Goddess of the Aesir and Freya of the Vanir. They are the one and the same. I maintain that the name Fresia, which Ercilla invented for the wife of the Araucanian Caupolican, comes from this Goddess. Ercilla was a Visigoth with blue eyes and fair hair, in the epic poem ofLa Aracana he tried to give us the key to the secret: the Aracanians of whom he tells us were Nordic Hyperborean Warriors, descendants of the White Gods of America-Albania. Ercilla sang to us in code. The God of the Friesians was Fosite - the Fosite of the Edda - sin of Baldur, the fairest of the Gods of Ancient Germany. It was with his death that the Twilight of the Gods was unleashed. But Wotan whispered a great secret, a key word, into His ear as He lay on His funeral pyre.
Spanuth maintains that the island of Helgoland or Heligoland, in the North sea, is a last remnant of the sunken Atlantis, or rather of Hyperborea. The most ancient name for Helgoland is Fostlandia. It is a mass of rock that has survived a great catastrophe. Other islands which are now submerged, still protruded from the water in the sixth and ninth centuries of our age. It was always Holy Ground, belonging to the cult of Fosite or Forsite. Homer refers to it as the island of the Phaecians. Phoesia, in the Iliad; clearly a derivative of the God of the Polar Northman. In the seventh century, Boniface, His real name was Winfrith, forcefully converted the Friesians. But not for another century was the Holy island Christianized. It is in the Middle Ages that the name of Heiligesland, Holy land, terra Sanctis, as it continued to be called in Latin. Heil! From the Old German, which the Minnesänger used in the Middle Ages as a greeting in code. The Friesian language transformed it to Helgoland.
In ancient times, the cult of the God Fosite slowly became a cult of His female counterpart, the Goddess Foseta. A primordial disorientation was already being anticipated. Or perhaps it was being made clear that on this Holy Island, a Polar anteroom, a surviving part of the great lost Hyperborean continent, of Ultima Thule, the Magic Wedding, the Hieros-Gamos, was being performed. There the King of the Gods celebrated His marriage, the reunion. Tacitus tells us that Temples commemorating this sacred mystery existed on Helgoland.
At the time of the conversion of the Pagans by Bishop Liudger, who had been sent by Rome, a certain Saint Ursula mysteriously appeared, no one knew from where, as Patroness of the island. She was certainly a mythical, imaginary personage who was clearly conjured up to replace Forseta, thus reinventing the Archetype, dressing it up in new clothes. The most extraordinary part in all of this is that Ursula comes from Ursus, which means Bear (the animal of the North Pole: Arcthos, Arcthus, Arthur), thus indicating that constellation of Ursa Minor, the little bear, which includes the Pole Star, into which penetrated the top of the Pillar of IR - or Atlas - which supported the sky in the original Pole, in Hyperborea, Ultima Thule, the Paradise of Avalon. All of which continues to point to the end of the terrestrial Road of Return of the Lefthanded Swastika of the journey back to the Far North, the Nuptial Homeland, Paradesha.
It is for this reason that the Initiates in the Warrior order of A-Mor still perform their Magic Weddings (Gandharba) in Fositeland, which is now called Helgoland or Heligoland, a surviving devastated mass of rock, like the land of the Grail. All this so that one day the submerged continent of Hyperborea, the original North Pole, which today is the South Pole, may reappear. A jumping off point for the Morning Star, for Lucifer.
On the evening of February 13, 1945, an orgy of genocide and barbarism began against a defenseless German city, one of the greatest cultural centers of northern Europe. Within less than 14 hours not only was it reduced to flaming ruins, but an estimated one-third of its inhabitants, possibly as many as a half a million, had perished in what was the worst single event massacre of all time.
daysineuropa asked: Good evening. First of all I have to say that I enjoy most parts of your blog, as they representing your positive attitude towards our peoples tradition, culture and history, but one thing I always find a bit distracting is your uncritical approach towards National Socialism. While I understand that the National Socialist period is quite interesting from an aesthetical viewpoint (especially the Waffen SS and so on) I don't really get the fascination of its ideology and especially of [...]
Thank you for your thoughtful words about my blog. I appreciate that.
Yes, I am aware of the “Konservative Revolution”, of course. But there is nothing to be found about this movement I couldn’t agree with or subscribe to myself, truth be told. However, I deem it tiresome to be ‘forced’ to explain myself, concerning my endorsement of N.S. and my support for Adolf Hitler, when the main argument against his regime, as it is expressed by conservatives from the political Right, comes after the fact of his death and the tragic defeat of the Reich. Yes, he lost the war. Yes, millions of Germans perished, were injured, raped, made homeless, and else, during, and after the war. Yes, much of German territory was seized and turned over to the victors, never to be reunited with the Reich. Yes, the demise of historic N.S. marked the advent of liberalism, free market-capitalism, and cultural bolshevism after 1945.
Whatever calamity it is we do witness, and feel disgusted at, in our day and age, it can all be traced back to the fateful days in May 1945 when the Wehrmacht surrendered to the Anglo-American, French, and Soviet Armed Forces. And if you want to go that far, you may even blame Adolf Hitler and hold him responsible for each and everything that took place after his death. But mind you, is that not the same that can be said about every great and tragic figure in history, who have had grand visions and high aspirations and best intentions - yet, they fell short of accomplishing what they set out to achieve, and thus they are perceived as men who failed and they are measured in terms of the devastation and bloodshed in their wake instead of the ideas they were trailblazers as well as the ideals they were paragons for.
I take the liberty to appraise Adolf Hitler on my own, and with no consideration other than what he was striving for, wanted to accomplish and to manifest as a vision of grandeur. A vision, I may add, widely shared by his conservative critics before, and even during, the genesis of the Third Reich (that was heralded by none less that Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, for instance).
Much of the criticism voiced at NS and Adolf Hitler, by conservatives before the war, dealt with purely aesthetical and cultural issues rather than stemming from political disagreements. If the course of history would have followed another direction, with Adolf Hitler being triumphant and the Reich victorious at the end of the war, would there have been anyone, from among the conservative circles, who keep criticizing his regime? That’s very unlikely, because he would not only have fulfilled their dreams too but helped their ideas and values, much of which they have had in common with National Socialists anyway, to prevail in Europe and elsewhere for the foreseeable future.
You have mentioned the failed Putsch by Stauffenberg against Adolf Hitler… First of all, do you earnestly believe the subsequent destruction of the Reich could have been averted at this point, with people like Stauffenberg replacing the N.S.-regime in Germany? The enemies of Germany, with Churchill being the prime warmonger among them, wanted to destroy the Reich no matter what. They agreed to accept nothing but an unconditional surrender of the Reich. Hence it’s an illusion, and already was one the 20th of July, 1944, to believe a ceasefire with France, USA, and Great Britain could have been negotiated to stem the tide of war back towards the Eastern Front and thus spare the Reich from the devastation brought by the Red Army. And one more thing: With his Putsch attempt, Stauffenberg did achieve something actually. Not what he intended and hoped for, of course. But he made Adolf Hitler turn against the aristocratic, conservative officers corps he held in high esteem until the moment they attempted to murder him. As you surely know, the SS and the Gestapo rounded up many officers and politicians of the political Right who were suspected of plotting against the regime. Quite a few were executed or asked to committ suicide. Even Generalfeldmarschall Rommel was among them! This purge, triggered by the failed Putsch in 1944, seriously weakened the conservative circles and the political Right, on a personal level. They were never able to recover after 1945, when the vacant positions in politics, administration, and the justice system were taken over by exilants returning home — many of them were opposed to the movement of the “Konservative Revolution” as much as to N.S.. If you wonder why right wing-politics never again dominated the political agenda and the cultural life in Germany and Austria after the war, then you may blame Stauffenberg all the same.
Be that as it may, I hope you (and the other Anon who has asked me about this before) have now understood that my admiration for Adolf Hitler does not equal any ignorance to the adverse effects caused by his ultimate doom, as statesman and Führer of the Reich, for Germany as a nation and for the Germans as a people. Unlike you, I do blame his enemies, who were enemies of Germany and who remain enemies for everyone of European descent, for the calamity that befell our world ever since. I do not blame the man who fought against those enemies as valiant as no one else before or after him, even though his struggle was in vain. A Man against Time, whom we best remember by the obituary Knut Hamsun published on the 7th of May, 1945: 'Hitler was a warrior, a warrior for humankind and a preacher of the gospel of justice for all nations. He was a reforming character of the highest order, and his historical fate was that he functioned in a time of xampleless [unequalled] brutality, which in the end felled him. Thus may the ordinary Western European look at Adolf Hitler. And we, his close followers, bow our heads at his death.’ Thank you for your time and attention.
We have both climbed the ruins of the Solar Temple of Montségur, and one day we will rebuild it, in another land, when the Golden Age returns.
—Miguel Serrano, Nos - Book of the Resurrection (via hyperb0rean)